This isn’t a big issue for me (as far as I’m aware), it’s more of something that’s interested me. But what is the main difference, if any, of using `is_numeric`

over `preg_match`

(or vice versa) to validate user input values.

Example One:

```
<?php
$id = $_GET['id'];
if (!preg_match('/^[0-9]*$/', $id)) {
// Error
} else {
// Continue
}
?>
```

Example Two:

```
<?php
$id = $_GET['id'];
if (!is_numeric($id)) {
// Error
} else {
// Continue
}
?>
```

I assume both do exactly the same but is there any specific differences which could cause problems later somehow? Is there a “best way” or something I’m not seeing which makes them different.

`is_numeric()`

tests whether a value is a number. It doesn’t necessarily have to be an integer though – it could a decimal number or a number in scientific notation.

The `preg_match()`

example you’ve given only checks that a value contains the digits zero to nine; any number of them, and in any sequence.

Note that the regular expression you’ve given also isn’t a perfect integer checker, the way you’ve written it. It doesn’t allow for negatives; it does allow for a zero-length string (ie with no digits at all, which presumably shouldn’t be valid?), and it allows the number to have any number of leading zeros, which again may not be the intended.

[EDIT]As per your comment, a better regular expression might look like this:

```
/^[1-9][0-9]*$/
```

This forces the first digit to only be between 1 and 9, so you can’t have leading zeros. It also forces it to be at least one digit long, so solves the zero-length string issue.

You’re not worried about negatives, so that’s not an issue.

You might want to restrict the number of digits, because as things stand, it will allow strings that are too big to be stored as integers. To restrict this, you would change the star into a length restriction like so:

```
/^[1-9][0-9]{0,15}$/
```

This would allow the string to be between 1 and 16 digits long (ie the first digit plus 0-15 further digits). Feel free to adjust the numbers in the curly braces to suit your own needs. If you want a fixed length string, then you only need to specify one number in the braces.

Hope that helps.

According to http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.is-numeric.php, is_numeric alows something like “+0123.45e6” or “0xFF”. I think this not what you expect.

preg_match can be slow, and you can have something like 0000 or 0051.

I prefer using ctype_digit (works only with strings, it’s ok with $_GET).

```
<?php
$id = $_GET['id'];
if (ctype_digit($id)) {
echo 'ok';
} else {
echo 'nok';
}
?>
```

is_numeric() allows any form of number. so `1`

, `3.14159265`

, `2.71828e10`

are all “numeric”, while your regex boils down to the equivalent of `is_int()`

is_numeric would accept “-0.5e+12” as a valid ID.

Not exactly the same.

From the PHP docs of is_numeric:

```
'42' is numeric
'1337' is numeric
'1e4' is numeric
'not numeric' is NOT numeric
'Array' is NOT numeric
'9.1' is numeric
```

With your regex you only check for ‘basic’ numeric values.

Also `is_numeric()`

should be faster.

`is_numeric`

checks more:

Finds whether the given variable is numeric. Numeric strings consist

of optional sign, any number of digits, optional decimal part and

optional exponential part. Thus +0123.45e6 is a valid numeric value.

Hexadecimal notation (0xFF) is allowed too but only without sign,

decimal and exponential part.

is_numeric checks whether it is any sort of number, while your regex checks whether it is an integer, possibly with leading 0s. For an id, stored as an integer, it is quite likely that we will want to not have leading 0s. Following Spudley’s answer, we can do:

```
/^[1-9][0-9]*$/
```

However, as Spudley notes, the resulting string may be too large to be stored as a 32-bit or 64-bit integer value. The maximum value of an signed 32-bit integer is 2,147,483,647 (10 digits), and the maximum value of an signed 64-bit integer is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 (19 digits). However, many 10 and 19 digit integers are larger than the maximum 32-bit and 64-bit integers respectively. A simple regex-only solution would be:

```
/^[1-9][0-9]{0-8}$/
```

or

```
/^[1-9][0-9]{0-17}$/
```

respectively, but these “solutions” unhappily restrict each to 9 and 19 digit integers; hardly a satisfying result. A better solution might be something like:

```
$expr = '/^[1-9][0-9]*$/';
if (preg_match($expr, $id) && filter_var($id, FILTER_VALIDATE_INT)) {
echo 'ok';
} else {
echo 'nok';
}
```

If you’re *only* checking if it’s a number, `is_numeric()`

is much *much* better here. It’s more readable and a bit quicker than regex.

The issue with your regex here is that it won’t allow decimal values, so essentially you’ve just written `is_int()`

in regex. Regular expressions should only be used when there is a non-standard data format in your input; PHP has plenty of built in validation functions, even an email validator without regex.

PHP’s is_numeric function allows for floats as well as integers. At the same time, the is_int function is too strict if you want to validate form data (strings only). Therefore, you had usually best use regular expressions for this.

Strictly speaking, integers are whole numbers positive and negative, and also including zero. Here is a regular expression for this:

/^0$|^[-]?[1-9][0-9]*$/

OR, if you want to allow leading zeros:

/^[-]?[0]

|[1-9][0-9]$/

Note that this will allow for values such as -0000, which does not cause problems in PHP, however. (MySQL will also cast such values as 0.)

You may also want to confine the length of your integer for considerations of 32/64-bit PHP platform features and/or database compatibility. For instance, to limit the length of your integer to 9 digits (excluding the optional – sign), you could use:

/^0$|^[-]?[1-9][0-9]{0,8}$/

Meanwhile, all the values above will only restrict the values to integer,

so i use

```
/^[1-9][0-9\.]{0,15}$/
```

to allow float values too.

You can use this code for number validation:

```
if (!preg_match("/^[0-9]+$/i", $phone)) {
$errorMSG = 'Invalid Number!';
$error = 1;
}
```

Tags: phpphp, validation