import numpy as np y = np.array(((1,2,3),(4,5,6),(7,8,9))) OUTPUT: print(y.flatten()) [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9] print(y.ravel()) [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]
Both function return the same list.
Then what is the need of two different functions performing same job.
The current API is that:
flattenalways returns a copy.
ravelreturns a view of the original array whenever possible. This isn’t visible in the printed output, but if you modify the array returned by ravel, it may modify the entries in the original array. If you modify the entries in an array returned from flatten this will never happen. ravel will often be faster since no memory is copied, but you have to be more careful about modifying the array it returns.
reshape((-1,))gets a view whenever the strides of the array allow it even if that means you don’t always get a contiguous array.
As explained here a key difference is that
flatten is a method of an ndarray object and hence can only be called for true numpy arrays. In contrast
ravel() is a library-level function and hence can be called on any object that can successfully be parsed. For example
ravel() will work on a list of ndarrays, while flatten is not available for that type of object.
@IanH also points out important differences with memory handling in his answer.