Home » Java » What is the difference between Tomcat, JBoss and Glassfish?

What is the difference between Tomcat, JBoss and Glassfish?

Posted by: admin November 2, 2017 Leave a comment

Questions:

I am starting to look into Enterprise Java and the book I am following mentions that it will use JBoss. Netbeans ships with Glassfish. I have used Tomcat in the past.

What are the differences between these three programs?

Answers:

Tomcat is just a servlet container, i.e. it implements only the servlets and jsp specification. Glassfish and JBoss are full Java EE servers (including stuff like EJB, JMS, …), with Glassfish being the reference implementation of the latest Java EE 6 stack, but JBoss in 2010 was not fully supporting it yet.

Questions:
Answers:

Tomcat is merely an HTTP server and Java servlet container. JBoss and GlassFish are full-blown Java EE application servers, including an EJB container and all the other features of that stack. On the other hand, Tomcat has a lighter memory footprint (~60-70 MB), while those Java EE servers weigh in at hundreds of megs. Tomcat is very popular for simple web applications, or applications using frameworks such as Spring that do not require a full Java EE server. Administration of a Tomcat server is arguably easier, as there are fewer moving parts.

However, for applications that do require a full Java EE stack (or at least more pieces that could easily be bolted-on to Tomcat)… JBoss and GlassFish are two of the most popular open source offerings (the third one is Apache Geronimo, upon which the free version of IBM WebSphere is built). JBoss has a larger and deeper user community, and a more mature codebase. However, JBoss lags significantly behind GlassFish in implementing the current Java EE specs. Also, for those who prefer a GUI-based admin system… GlassFish’s admin console is extremely slick, whereas most administration in JBoss is done with a command-line and text editor. GlassFish comes straight from Sun/Oracle, with all the advantages that can offer. JBoss is NOT under the control of Sun/Oracle, with all the advantages THAT can offer.

Questions:
Answers:

You should use GlassFish for Java EE enterprise applications.
Some things to consider:

A web Server means: Handling HTTP requests (usually from
browsers).

A Servlet Container (e.g. Tomcat) means: It can handle
servlets & JSP.

An Application Server (e.g. GlassFish) means: *It can manage
Java EE applications (usually both servlet/JSP and EJBs).


Tomcat – is run by Apache community – Open source and has two flavors
Tomcat – Web profile – light weight which is only servlet container and does not support Java EE features like EJB, JMS etc.
Tomcat EE – This is a certified Java EE container, this supports all Java EE technologies.

No commercial support available (only community support)

JBoss – Run by RedHat
This is a full stack support for JavaEE and it is a certified Java EE container.
This includes Tomcat as web container internally.
This also has two flavors
Community version called Application Server (AS) – this will have only community support
Enterprise Application Server ( EAP) – For this, you can have subscription based license (It’s based on number of Cores you have on your servers.)

Glassfish – Run by Oracle
This is also a full stack certified Java EE Container. This has its own web container (not Tomcat).
This comes from Oracle itself,so all new specs will be tested and implemented with Glassfish first. So, always it would support the latest spec. I am not aware of its support models.

Questions:
Answers:

jboss and glassfish include a servlet container(like tomcat), however the two application servers (jboss and glassfish) also provide a bean container (and a few other things aswell I imagine)

Questions:
Answers:

JBoss and Glassfish are basically full Java EE Application Server whereas Tomcat is only a Servlet container.
The main difference between JBoss, Glassfish but also WebSphere, WebLogic and so on respect to Tomcat but also Jetty, was in the functionality that an full app server offer. When you had a full stack Java EE app server you can benefit of all the implementation of the vendor of your choice, and you can benefit of EJB, JTA, CDI(JAVA EE 6+), JPA, JSF, JSP/Servlet of course and so on. With Tomcat on the other hands you can benefit only of JSP/Servlet. However to day with advanced Framework such as Spring and Guice, many of the main advantage of using an a full stack application server can be mitigate, and with the assumption of a one of this framework manly with Spring Ecosystem, you can benefit of many sub project that in the my work experience let me to left the use of a full stack app server in favour of lightweight app server like tomcat.

Questions:
Answers:

Both JBoss and Tomcat are Java servlet application servers, but JBoss is a whole lot more. The substantial difference between the two is that JBoss provides a full Java Enterprise Edition (Java EE) stack, including Enterprise JavaBeans and many other technologies that are useful for developers working on enterprise Java applications.

Tomcat is much more limited. One way to think of it is that JBoss is a Java EE stack that includes a servlet container and web server, whereas Tomcat, for the most part, is a servlet container and web server.

Questions:
Answers:

Apache tomcat is just an only serverlet container it does not support for Enterprise Java application(JEE). JBoss and Glassfish are supporting for JEE application but Glassfish much heavy than JBOSS server : Reference Slide

Questions:
Answers:

It seems a bit discouraging to use Tomcat when you read these answers. However what most fail to mention is that you can get to identical or almost identical use cases with tomcat but that requires you to add the libraries needed (through Maven or whatever include system you use).

I have been running tomcat with JPA, EJBs with very small configuration efforts.